PASETSKY’S COVER CRITIQUE
My first reaction to this cover is confusion!
I’m not sure that Star knew what to do with these “exclusive” photos of Britney.
Yes, she looks good but is it the right picture for a bikini body cover?
I (unfortunately) don’t think so.
I say unfortunately because in society we expect our stars to look super-slim. Here Britney doesn’t look that way.
The other piece that’s missing from this cover is a before pic - which would prove that Britney looks better and support Stars claim that Britney lost “20 lbs in 30 days.”
On a positive note, at least Star is using pictures from 2008 unlike OK Magazine’s recent Britney diet cover.
In other news, Lindsay Lohan had a drunken rampage and guess what — she’s in the same spot “drunk” on Star’s cover as she was a few weeks ago.
Keep up the good rehab work Lindsay, because Star has an inset ready and waiting for you!
Bottom Line: Candace Trunzo got excited by her “exclusive” Britney beach pics, but newsstand buyers won’t buy it.
No comments:
Post a Comment